<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Business-Case on David R. Longnecker - Converting Coffee to Code</title><link>https://drlongnecker.com/tags/business-case/</link><description>Recent content in Business-Case on David R. Longnecker - Converting Coffee to Code</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://drlongnecker.com/tags/business-case/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Your ROI Number Is in the Wrong Language</title><link>https://drlongnecker.com/blog/2026/08/your-roi-number-wrong-language/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://drlongnecker.com/blog/2026/08/your-roi-number-wrong-language/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every AI business case someone hands me starts the same way. A number gets picked before anyone&amp;rsquo;s agreed on what the number is supposed to represent. Revenue? Cost avoided? A risk the company no longer has to carry? Nobody&amp;rsquo;s agreed, yet the number got picked anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- more --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like most product or technology ventures, what &amp;ldquo;good&amp;rdquo; is needs to be defined by someone and rarely can be inherited.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The math is genuinely different every time. Whether it&amp;rsquo;s different cost structures, different appetite for a multi-year payback, or something else, what&amp;rsquo;s constant isn&amp;rsquo;t the formula. It&amp;rsquo;s the discipline underneath it, and that discipline has three steps I keep seeing skipped everywhere, from business cases to Reddit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>