<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Investment-Allocation on David R. Longnecker - Converting Coffee to Code</title><link>https://drlongnecker.com/tags/investment-allocation/</link><description>Recent content in Investment-Allocation on David R. Longnecker - Converting Coffee to Code</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://drlongnecker.com/tags/investment-allocation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Strategy to Product Gap</title><link>https://drlongnecker.com/blog/2026/07/strategy-product-investment-feedback-gap/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://drlongnecker.com/blog/2026/07/strategy-product-investment-feedback-gap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Product leaders spend enormous energy translating strategy down, turning an executive narrative into a roadmap teams can actually build against. Almost none of that energy runs the other direction. In many organizations, nobody owns translating what teams learn while building (this feature didn&amp;rsquo;t move the metric, that segment doesn&amp;rsquo;t behave like the strategy assumed) back up into a change in investment allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The result isn&amp;rsquo;t that strategy is wrong on day one. It&amp;rsquo;s that investment remains allocated the same way for two more quarters after the teams executing it already know it&amp;rsquo;s off, because there&amp;rsquo;s no structural path for that knowledge to travel upward and get acted on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>